Skip to content

fix: setVerificationMethod extrinsics and logic #878

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 17, 2024

Conversation

rflechtner
Copy link
Contributor

@rflechtner rflechtner commented Jul 16, 2024

I reviewed the setVerificationMethod implementation and found two issues that need fixing.
I'm addressing them here.

Checklist:

  • I have verified that the code works
  • I have verified that the code is easy to understand
    • If not, I have left a well-balanced amount of inline comments
  • I have left the code in a better state
  • I have documented the changes (where applicable)
    • Either PR or Ticket to update the Docs
    • Link the PR/Ticket here

@rflechtner rflechtner requested a review from abdulmth July 16, 2024 15:38
@rflechtner rflechtner mentioned this pull request Jul 17, 2024
5 tasks
@rflechtner rflechtner merged commit 8a4ce8d into rf-did-helpers Jul 17, 2024
4 checks passed
@rflechtner rflechtner deleted the rf-fix-setting-key-agreement branch July 17, 2024 09:12
rflechtner added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
* fix: make sure existing keyAgreement VMs are replaced
* fix: use correct extrinsic for assertionMethod
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants